DP 9 impressions and issues thread

For seeking technical help with Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
User avatar
MIDI Life Crisis
Posts: 26279
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Contact:

Re: DP 9 impressions and issues thread

Post by MIDI Life Crisis »

Well, wIt for what? 6 months for a fully functional version, good for 6 months then another semi-functional DP 10 release and no real bug fixes while MOTU develops their hardware side? That's the last time I jump on a DP upgrade. It used to be a bit better than this but it seems to be going down hill when it comes to clean releases and .1 bug fixed releases.
2013 Mac Pro 2TB/32GB RAM

OSX 10.14.6; Track 16; DP 12; Finale 28

LinkTree (events & peformances)
Instagram
Facebook

MIDI LIFE CRISIS
Killahurts
Posts: 2233
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: USA

Re: DP 9 impressions and issues thread

Post by Killahurts »

Best new feature with DP9 is that it doesn't overwrite DP8.

My rig was going along well with DP9, even with a big project.. but last night I tried to do some pitch automation.. crashed several times, always from making one to a few simple pitch automation edits.

Went back to DP8, and all my docs work correctly, even after saving in DP9, so, at least there's that. :wink:
DP11, 2019 16-Core Mac Pro, OS 14 Sonoma , 64GB RAM. RME HDSPe MADI FX to SSL Alphalink to SSL Matrix console, and multiple digital sub consoles. UAD Quad PCIe. Outboard stuff.
musicman691

Re: DP 9 impressions and issues thread

Post by musicman691 »

Killahurts wrote:Best new feature with DP9 is that it doesn't overwrite DP8.

My rig was going along well with DP9, even with a big project.. but last night I tried to do some pitch automation.. crashed several times, always from making one to a few simple pitch automation edits.

Went back to DP8, and all my docs work correctly, even after saving in DP9, so, at least there's that. :wink:
Agreed and then some. Only thing now is DP9 becomes the default program to open a DP session if DP isn't open and you double click on the session. Of course that can be changed.
Killahurts
Posts: 2233
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: USA

Re: DP 9 impressions and issues thread

Post by Killahurts »

MIDI Life Crisis wrote:Well, wIt for what? 6 months for a fully functional version, good for 6 months then another semi-functional DP 10 release and no real bug fixes while MOTU develops their hardware side? That's the last time I jump on a DP upgrade. It used to be a bit better than this but it seems to be going down hill when it comes to clean releases and .1 bug fixed releases.
Yeah, I have to admit, this release is not a very good value. Should have been DP8.5 but then they could not have charged for that, really.

I don't feel completely ripped off because I'm going to stick with this DAW, and DP9 will be better in the future.. just feels like I gave MOTU a $200 loan, that's all. :wink:
DP11, 2019 16-Core Mac Pro, OS 14 Sonoma , 64GB RAM. RME HDSPe MADI FX to SSL Alphalink to SSL Matrix console, and multiple digital sub consoles. UAD Quad PCIe. Outboard stuff.
User avatar
MIDI Life Crisis
Posts: 26279
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Contact:

Re: DP 9 impressions and issues thread

Post by MIDI Life Crisis »

Well put, but I'm not in a position to make a loan to a company. It wasn't exactly a "sacrifice" but if I knew it was going to be unusable I certainly wouldn't have been so quick to fork over my $$$.
2013 Mac Pro 2TB/32GB RAM

OSX 10.14.6; Track 16; DP 12; Finale 28

LinkTree (events & peformances)
Instagram
Facebook

MIDI LIFE CRISIS
User avatar
mhschmieder
Posts: 11416
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Annandale VA

Re: DP 9 impressions and issues thread

Post by mhschmieder »

I suppose if you wanted MX4, that was worth the price of admission alone.

Value is in the eyes of the beholder. It's hard to please everybody, when it comes to feature priorities.

Stability should come first though. Unfortunately, the current climate does not support that; I have seen it across the industry. I've been warning people about this for years. It isn't sustainable though, so at some point, the pressure to deliver bells and whistles at all costs, will diminish.
Mac Studio 2025 14-Core Apple M4 Max (36 GB RAM), OSX 15.5, MOTU DP 11.34, SpectraLayers 11
RME Babyface Pro FS, Radial JDV Mk5, Hammond XK-4, Moog Voyager

Eugenio Upright, 60th Anniversary P-Bass, USA Geddy Lee J-Bass, Yamaha BBP35
Select Strat, 70th Anniversary Esquire, Johnny Marr Jaguar, 57 LP, Danelectro 12
Eastman T486RB, T64/V, Ibanez PM2, D'angelico Deluxe SS Bari, EXL1
Guild Bari, 1512 12-string, M20, Martin OM28VTS, Larivee 0040MH
User avatar
mhschmieder
Posts: 11416
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Annandale VA

Re: DP 9 impressions and issues thread

Post by mhschmieder »

When I worked at Autodesk, after one disastrous release (with an unlucky number), it was decided that the best policy would be to alternate stability releases with feature releases.

I don't know if they have stuck with that philosophy over the years (and I still use AutoCAD -- including the code I wrote for it -- daily in the 16 years since I left the company), but there does still seem to be this idea that the native file format should only change in alternate releases.

Anyway, it gets back to the pyramid of optimizing for two out of three amongst time-to-market, stability/reliability, and features/enhancements. It's just a way of managing projects so that there is less chance of focus drift, feature creep, mission creep, etc. Everyone benefits.

Unfortunately, few people today realize that you can't have all three at the same priority level. I have seen this downward trend in professionalism and overall degradation of engineering principles across the tech industry.

Having said that, I have no reason to think that MOTU is sliding down that slippery slope themselves.

The trend has been towards pseudo-subscription models via more frequent updates and higher pricing for updates, from folks like iZotope and others.

So I think each company comes up with their own strategy to try to balance perception vs. reality in terms of value and bang-for-buck in what is essentially a long-term departure from traditional release models for software. Continuous development is the norm now. Companies struggle with the naming thing (e.g. year-based revisions, ".5" releases, other point releases, major releases, etc.).

Anyway, I'm not trying to make excuses if DP9 is as bad as people are saying -- I haven't worked with it enough yet to have run into these issues. But I think it's premature to conclude that MOTU is being sloppy and/or will make us pay again for DP10 in order to get fixes vs. putting out more point releases as in the pre-DP8 days.

My guess is that DP8 had few updates because there was a huge resource drain to focus on the Windows launch and stabilizing that platform. So that was hopefully a one-off in terms of "surprise; no more DP8 updates, but here's DP9 now".
Mac Studio 2025 14-Core Apple M4 Max (36 GB RAM), OSX 15.5, MOTU DP 11.34, SpectraLayers 11
RME Babyface Pro FS, Radial JDV Mk5, Hammond XK-4, Moog Voyager

Eugenio Upright, 60th Anniversary P-Bass, USA Geddy Lee J-Bass, Yamaha BBP35
Select Strat, 70th Anniversary Esquire, Johnny Marr Jaguar, 57 LP, Danelectro 12
Eastman T486RB, T64/V, Ibanez PM2, D'angelico Deluxe SS Bari, EXL1
Guild Bari, 1512 12-string, M20, Martin OM28VTS, Larivee 0040MH
User avatar
bayswater
Posts: 12499
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:06 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Vancouver

Re: DP 9 impressions and issues thread

Post by bayswater »

MIDI Life Crisis wrote:Well, wIt for what? 6 months for a fully functional version, good for 6 months then another semi-functional DP 10 release and no real bug fixes while MOTU develops their hardware side? That's the last time I jump on a DP upgrade. It used to be a bit better than this but it seems to be going down hill when it comes to clean releases and .1 bug fixed releases.
I don't recall it being better in the past. 6 wasn't. 7 and 8 had bugs, and these were addressed over a few .0x updates. IIRC, it was 7.1.2 and 8.06 before things tightened up. Anyway, I don't think we're going to be waiting 6 months. Elsewhere on the forum is the message that the 9.01 update is on its way.
2018 Mini i7 32G macOS 12.7.6, DP 11.33, Mixbus 10, Logic 10.7.9, Scarlett 18i8, MB Air M2, macOS 14.7.6, DP 11.33, Logic 11
User avatar
MIDI Life Crisis
Posts: 26279
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Contact:

Re: DP 9 impressions and issues thread

Post by MIDI Life Crisis »

Maybe I'm just disappointed in getting such a buggy release l.
2013 Mac Pro 2TB/32GB RAM

OSX 10.14.6; Track 16; DP 12; Finale 28

LinkTree (events & peformances)
Instagram
Facebook

MIDI LIFE CRISIS
User avatar
mikehalloran
Posts: 16228
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:08 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Sillie Con Valley

Re: DP 9 impressions and issues thread

Post by mikehalloran »

Should have been DP8.5 but then they could not have charged for that, really.
It wouldn't be the first time. DP 4.5 was a paid release.
DP 11.34; 828mkII FW, micro lite, M4, MTP/AV USB Firmware 2.0.1
2023 Mac Studio M2 8TB, 192GB RAM, OS Sequoia 15.4, USB4 8TB externals, Neumann MT48, M-Audio AIR 192|14, Mackie ProFxv3, Zoom F3 & UAC 232 32bit float recorder & interface; 2012 MBPs (x2) Catalina, Mojave
IK-NI-Izotope-PSP-Garritan-Antares, LogicPro X, Finale 27.4, Dorico 5, Notion 6, Overture 5, TwistedWave, DSP-Q 5, SmartScore64 NE Pro, Toast 20 Pro
User avatar
BKK-OZ
Posts: 1977
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Oztrailia
Contact:

Re: DP 9 impressions and issues thread

Post by BKK-OZ »

Well, I wrote earlier that I struggle to see compelling reasons for upgrading right now.
I still see it that way.

8 isn't buggy.
MX4 isn't worth $200.
And the rest?
Meh.
Cheers,
BK

…string theory says that all subatomic particles of the universe are nothing but musical notes. A, B-flat, C-sharp, correspond to electrons, neutrinos, quarks, and what have you. Therefore, physics is nothing but the laws of harmony of these strings. Chemistry is nothing but the melodies we can play on these strings. The universe is a symphony of strings and the mind of God… it is cosmic music resonating through 11 dimensional hyperspace.
- M Kaku
User avatar
toodamnhip
Posts: 3850
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Contact:

Re: DP 9 impressions and issues thread

Post by toodamnhip »

BKK-OZ wrote:Well, I wrote earlier that I struggle to see compelling reasons for upgrading right now.
I still see it that way.

8 isn't buggy.
MX4 isn't worth $200.
And the rest?
Meh.
I think MX 4 cost more than 200 when they sold it. I wonder if they still DO sell it for DP 8 and other DAWS?
Mac Pro (Late 2013
2.7 GHz 12-Core Intel Xeon E5
64 GB 1866 MHz DDR3
Mojave
DP 10.13
MOTU 8pre, MTP AV, 828 mkII
Tons of VIS and plug ins. SSD hard drives etc
User avatar
BKK-OZ
Posts: 1977
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Oztrailia
Contact:

Re: DP 9 impressions and issues thread

Post by BKK-OZ »

Dunno if they still sell it seperately.
There are a number of VI's that I would invest in before spending $200 on MX4.
Cheers,
BK

…string theory says that all subatomic particles of the universe are nothing but musical notes. A, B-flat, C-sharp, correspond to electrons, neutrinos, quarks, and what have you. Therefore, physics is nothing but the laws of harmony of these strings. Chemistry is nothing but the melodies we can play on these strings. The universe is a symphony of strings and the mind of God… it is cosmic music resonating through 11 dimensional hyperspace.
- M Kaku
Killahurts
Posts: 2233
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: USA

Re: DP 9 impressions and issues thread

Post by Killahurts »

mikehalloran wrote:
Should have been DP8.5 but then they could not have charged for that, really.
It wouldn't be the first time. DP 4.5 was a paid release.
I had not forgotten that.. but IIRC, the 4.5 update was significant, well worth the price for what it offered. The problem with some here seems to be paying $200 and getting a buggy release that doesn't have enough new features to merit an entire numeral upgrade (8 to 9).
DP11, 2019 16-Core Mac Pro, OS 14 Sonoma , 64GB RAM. RME HDSPe MADI FX to SSL Alphalink to SSL Matrix console, and multiple digital sub consoles. UAD Quad PCIe. Outboard stuff.
User avatar
bayswater
Posts: 12499
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:06 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Vancouver

Re: DP 9 impressions and issues thread

Post by bayswater »

If any number of people still paid more than $200 for MX4, it wouldn't be free with DP.
2018 Mini i7 32G macOS 12.7.6, DP 11.33, Mixbus 10, Logic 10.7.9, Scarlett 18i8, MB Air M2, macOS 14.7.6, DP 11.33, Logic 11
Post Reply