Definitely not the case here.JSmith1234567 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 7:59 amHey thanks for that report!waterstrum wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 3:03 am FWIW,
I'm getting better performance from my old cheesegrater on DP11.
A heavy session no longer busts the Audio Performance with clicks and pops.
DP11 is much better and I'm even going to 64 buffer for recording VIs.
They must have done something about the efficiency.
I think I can keep this old box for a year or two.
That said, I'm bound for AS when it comes up to MacPro form.
That is terrific news.
Can I ask if you did a whole clean install or just update, and what OSX are you using? Thanks!
The largish project I'm working on now is much snappier in 10.13 than 11 - I started it back in 10 and then Loaded into a new 11 project in an attempt to speed things up. The CPU performance seems about the same, but graphics related things (maybe?) like track zooming of waveforms, and Option-clicking on text to, say, rename the track is much clunkier....a few second pause on the latter in 11, while it's instantaneous in 10. And most importantly creating Fades without the Fade dialogue takes a prohibitively long time in 11 compared to 10.13. Putting the buffer to the max, 2048 in my case, has no affect.
Waterstrum doesn't include their specs in there sig, so I don't know what the dif is in our rigs might be. I'd also be curious about their OS.