viewtopic.php?f=1&t=62125Rusty Shackleford wrote: James: I must've missed this sustain pedal bug earlier in the thread; what is the nature of the bug? Thanks.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=62147
Moderator: James Steele
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=62125Rusty Shackleford wrote: James: I must've missed this sustain pedal bug earlier in the thread; what is the nature of the bug? Thanks.
Thanks, cuttime. Deal breaker for me.cuttime wrote:viewtopic.php?f=1&t=62125Rusty Shackleford wrote: James: I must've missed this sustain pedal bug earlier in the thread; what is the nature of the bug? Thanks.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=62147
Hope so.James Steele wrote:It should be addressed soon. MOTU is aware of it.
It's high on their priority list. They know about this and know what a PITA it is, and you can probably bet that it will be fixed with an update soon. There are people on this board who have heard that directly from MOTU.Rusty Shackleford wrote:Hope so.James Steele wrote:It should be addressed soon. MOTU is aware of it.
Heard it today... Friday Aug 19 2016James Steele wrote:It's high on their priority list. They know about this and know what a PITA it is, and you can probably bet that it will be fixed with an update soon. There are people on this board who have heard that directly from MOTU.Rusty Shackleford wrote:Hope so.James Steele wrote:It should be addressed soon. MOTU is aware of it.
There are other issues as well that MOTU has promised to fix (via TechLink responses) in the next release. MOTU's tech support has really come a long way. I suspect they are working hard to make 9.1.1 (or whatever they call it) more reliable and the people here have helped them do that through TechLinks. Keep sending those in folks. We're making a difference.James Steele wrote:They know about this and know what a PITA it is, and you can probably bet that it will be fixed with an update soon. There are people on this board who have heard that directly from MOTU.
I hope not. I wouldn't want to see the terrorists influence how we work with numbers.James Steele wrote:I have a feeling they'll skip past 9.11 just because of the negative association with that number now.
Well now you know of course this opens up a whole can of worms, and a topic that I cannot continue to discuss without violating the rules here.MIDI Life Crisis wrote:I hope not. I wouldn't want to see the terrorists influence how we work with numbers.James Steele wrote:I have a feeling they'll skip past 9.11 just because of the negative association with that number now.
I think James was looking at MLC's "terrorist" comment Phil.Phil O wrote:Oh, oh. I didn't catch that. My brain was still focused on the numbering scheme. So is Greek mythology too close to religion?
We could go with biology. How about DP Mitochondria? Nah, doesn't have the same flare.
I'll shut up now.
Ooops. didn't catch that either. Sorry, James. I read your reply but didn't read the quote. I really have to pay better attention.HCMarkus wrote:I think James was looking at MLC's "terrorist" comment Phil.