Tiger Vs. Leopard
Moderator: James Steele
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:15 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Tiger Vs. Leopard
Though both Tiger and Leopard are both relatively ancient OS's, I remember scattered vehement arguments on the web in favor of Tiger's Core Audio. Some claim that no OS's subsequent to Tiger boast significant improvements to Core Audio, and further claim that -- at least as far as audio -- Tiger is way more stable than Leopard or Snow Leopard. They go on to claim that Leopard introduces quirky software behavior. I'm not sure I buy this. Anybody care to weigh in?
- James Steele
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 22835
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: San Diego, CA - U.S.A.
- Contact:
Re: Tiger Vs. Leopard
I think it's all water under the bridge since fewer and fewer Macs will use Tiger and DP is no longer officially supported on Tiger.
JamesSteeleProject.com | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter
Mac Studio M1 Max, 64GB/2TB, macOS Sequoia 15.5 Public Beta 2, DP 11.34, MOTU 828es, MOTU 24Ai, MOTU MIDI Express XT, UAD-2 TB3 Satellite OCTO, Console 1 Mk2, Avid S3, NI Komplete Kontrol S88 Mk2, Red Type B, Millennia HV-3C, Warm Audio WA-2A, AudioScape 76F, Dean guitars, Marshall amps, etc., etc.!
Mac Studio M1 Max, 64GB/2TB, macOS Sequoia 15.5 Public Beta 2, DP 11.34, MOTU 828es, MOTU 24Ai, MOTU MIDI Express XT, UAD-2 TB3 Satellite OCTO, Console 1 Mk2, Avid S3, NI Komplete Kontrol S88 Mk2, Red Type B, Millennia HV-3C, Warm Audio WA-2A, AudioScape 76F, Dean guitars, Marshall amps, etc., etc.!
- mikehalloran
- Posts: 16261
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:08 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Sillie Con Valley
Re: Tiger Vs. Leopard
DP 4.6.1 in OS 10.4.11 is about as rock solid as it gets. DP 5.13 in OS 10.5.8 is equally good.
Time Machine, in my opinion, is why OS 10.5 is the bare minimum for anyone running professional aps i.e. where time=money. If you have a fast enough PPC, there is no reason not to be on it. If you have an intel chip, you need 10.6.
For hobbyists... hey, whatever works, works I suppose. I made great recordings on my Beige G3 using DP 2.7 on OS 8.6. But that was then...
Those of us who use DP to make all or part of our living need to be on the latest, most up to date versions of the hardware, OS and DP that works. Right now, that's DP 7.2, OS 10.6.x and intel processor.
Yes, if you read my signature, you know that I am behind the curve but, like many, I have been waiting for yesterday's announcements to upgrade. I'll be spending a few thousand $$$$ in the next few months to upgrade everything. I do wish I had some idea when DP 8 was coming out, though.
In my case, I am looking at the latest iMac for three reasons. It costs a lot less than a Mac Pro/large Apple monitor, I don't do much with VI and it uses about 50% the energy (and generates less heat) than a tower and big monitor. Half the time I run my air conditioner, it's to keep my G5 cool so I'm kind of sensitive on this issue. I really want a Mac Pro ... well, you can't have too much horsepower so, if I can find another $2,000 or so, I may still go there with a 6 or 8 core... Maybe.
Time Machine, in my opinion, is why OS 10.5 is the bare minimum for anyone running professional aps i.e. where time=money. If you have a fast enough PPC, there is no reason not to be on it. If you have an intel chip, you need 10.6.
For hobbyists... hey, whatever works, works I suppose. I made great recordings on my Beige G3 using DP 2.7 on OS 8.6. But that was then...
Those of us who use DP to make all or part of our living need to be on the latest, most up to date versions of the hardware, OS and DP that works. Right now, that's DP 7.2, OS 10.6.x and intel processor.
Yes, if you read my signature, you know that I am behind the curve but, like many, I have been waiting for yesterday's announcements to upgrade. I'll be spending a few thousand $$$$ in the next few months to upgrade everything. I do wish I had some idea when DP 8 was coming out, though.
In my case, I am looking at the latest iMac for three reasons. It costs a lot less than a Mac Pro/large Apple monitor, I don't do much with VI and it uses about 50% the energy (and generates less heat) than a tower and big monitor. Half the time I run my air conditioner, it's to keep my G5 cool so I'm kind of sensitive on this issue. I really want a Mac Pro ... well, you can't have too much horsepower so, if I can find another $2,000 or so, I may still go there with a 6 or 8 core... Maybe.
DP 11.34; 828mkII FW, micro lite, M4, MTP/AV USB Firmware 2.0.1
2023 Mac Studio M2 8TB, 192GB RAM, OS Sequoia 15.4, USB4 8TB externals, Neumann MT48, M-Audio AIR 192|14, Mackie ProFxv3, Zoom F3 & UAC 232 32bit float recorder & interface; 2012 MBPs (x2) Catalina, Mojave
IK-NI-Izotope-PSP-Garritan-Antares, LogicPro X, Finale 27.4, Dorico 5, Notion 6, Overture 5, TwistedWave, DSP-Q 5, SmartScore64 NE Pro, Toast 20 Pro
2023 Mac Studio M2 8TB, 192GB RAM, OS Sequoia 15.4, USB4 8TB externals, Neumann MT48, M-Audio AIR 192|14, Mackie ProFxv3, Zoom F3 & UAC 232 32bit float recorder & interface; 2012 MBPs (x2) Catalina, Mojave
IK-NI-Izotope-PSP-Garritan-Antares, LogicPro X, Finale 27.4, Dorico 5, Notion 6, Overture 5, TwistedWave, DSP-Q 5, SmartScore64 NE Pro, Toast 20 Pro