monkey man wrote:Yay! Fwoggy's gone octa millenium on us.
Well done, mate.




Moderator: James Steele
It would be the boss to have it both ways but I fear it is not such, I will look in to it. This fall after contract I will be wanting to get a new Pro.Frodo wrote:[
The other fw caveat-- if you have a 400 device and an 800 device connected, the transfer rate will be 400. The bus is only as fast as the slowest device connected to it. That is, unless Apple has changed something with this, meaning dual point-to-point running on a single bus where 800 stays 800 while a 400 device is concurrently working at optimum.
Yeah, would be cool if not true, but I feel Frodo is probably right on that one - at least historically that is the way it has been, but of course you never know what Apple has done........now that the bus has been pushed much faster, maybe the recommendation that Focusrite gives about LM needing its own bus would not be needed on these machines.twistedtom wrote:It would be the boss to have it both ways but I fear it is not such, I will look in to it. This fall after contract I will be wanting to get a new Pro.Frodo wrote:[
The other fw caveat-- if you have a 400 device and an 800 device connected, the transfer rate will be 400. The bus is only as fast as the slowest device connected to it. That is, unless Apple has changed something with this, meaning dual point-to-point running on a single bus where 800 stays 800 while a 400 device is concurrently working at optimum.
It would be cool if USB was not slowed down by the slowest device as well.
I run a 2nd USB card for USB2.
Sorry, that should've been "octa millenial".Frodo wrote:monkey man wrote:Yay! Fwoggy's gone octa millenium on us.
Well done, mate.![]()
![]()
![]()