DP MP3 creation vs iTunes.

Discussion of Digital Performer use, optimization, tips and techniques on Windows.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for most discussion related to the use and optimization of Digital Performer [Windows] and plug-ins as well as tips and techniques. It is NOT for troubleshooting technical issues, complaints, feature requests, or "Comparative DAW 101."
User avatar
monkey man
Posts: 13933
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: DP MP3 creation vs iTunes.

Post by monkey man »

NealF wrote: Sun May 23, 2021 5:45 am Thanks Monkey Man.
I'll do some testing.
My pleasure, Neal. :headbang:
Bobbyd wrote: Sun May 23, 2021 10:28 am I used to bounce to mp3s (320 bitrate) but last year I started bouncing to AIFF. Next I open the AIFF with Audicity - partly so I can see the result of the soundwave. From there I export to 320 Mp3. But since I lack expertise in mastering, the results vary in quality anyway.
Yup. I use also WAV or AIFF in Audacity for the MP3 export, albeit converted from FLAC using XLD, Bobby.
rp88.2 wrote: Sun May 23, 2021 8:27 am Hi Neal:

I usually use XLD (X Lossless Decoder) as my converter from uncompressed formats (AIFF or WAV) to AAC or MP3 encoded files.
XLD is great, Rich.

I didn't even know I could use it for MP3 export. As I said to Bobby, I use it to turn FLAC into WAV for MP3 conversion in Audacity.

To recap in case anyone's confused by all this:
Don't use iTunes for MP3 conversion unless quality isn't paramount to you.
Use Audacity or any other app that employs L.A.M.E. as long as you're able to define the CBR, 320k and "Normal Stereo" parameters.

Beyond that, there's really nothing else to know. I guarantee that your own side-by-side comparisons will confirm the efficacy of this approach.

Mac 2012 12C Cheese Grater, OSX 10.13.6
MOTU DP8.07, MachFive 3.2.1, MIDI Express XT, 24I/O
Novation, Yamaha & Roland Synths, Guitar & Bass, Kemper Rack

Pretend I've placed your favourite quote here
rp88.2
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2017 5:54 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

Re: DP MP3 creation vs iTunes.

Post by rp88.2 »

monkey man wrote: Sun May 23, 2021 6:50 pm
To recap in case anyone's confused by all this:
Don't use iTunes for MP3 conversion unless quality isn't paramount to you.
Use Audacity or any other app that employs L.A.M.E. as long as you're able to define the CBR, 320k and "Normal Stereo" parameters.

Beyond that, there's really nothing else to know. I guarantee that your own side-by-side comparisons will confirm the efficacy of this approach.
Agree! Choose 'Stereo' as opposed to 'Joint Stereo' in the export/converter options.

Good luck!!
User avatar
monkey man
Posts: 13933
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: DP MP3 creation vs iTunes.

Post by monkey man »

:headbang:

Mac 2012 12C Cheese Grater, OSX 10.13.6
MOTU DP8.07, MachFive 3.2.1, MIDI Express XT, 24I/O
Novation, Yamaha & Roland Synths, Guitar & Bass, Kemper Rack

Pretend I've placed your favourite quote here
IsrealHernandez
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon May 08, 2023 7:49 am
Primary DAW OS: Windows

Re: DP MP3 creation vs iTunes.

Post by IsrealHernandez »

I always use iTunes to convert MP3 files. It's much more convenient and faster than DP.
User avatar
FMiguelez
Posts: 8266
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Body: Narco-México Soul/Heart: NYC

Re: DP MP3 creation vs iTunes.

Post by FMiguelez »

NealF wrote: Fri May 21, 2021 3:25 pm Hm.
Just wondering if I should take the 320k mp3s I already made and make 256 instead.
Or is that a waste of time?

Will customers who get the 320 be able to play it on anything they have?
When in doubt, I REALLY recommend doing a null test between the bounced 32bFP wav file against the different app sources and rates of mp3 of interest, and even among the mp3 against themselves.
Use a nice FFT analyzer that shows you the full dynamic and freq. ranges for best comparisons (i.e., Voxengo, Melda).
This is a great way to become familiar with any mp3-created artifacts. You can easily hear the exact difference between them and tells you what to listen for in blind tests.

Play with this stuff for a couple of hours or so. Quite educational and fun! :)
Mac Mini Server i7 2.66 GHs/16 GB RAM / OSX 10.14 / DP 9.52
Tascam DM-24, MOTU Track 16, all Spectrasonics' stuff,
Vienna Instruments SUPER PACKAGE, Waves Mercury, slaved iMac and Mac Minis running VEP 7, etc.

---------------------------

"In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth." ― Richard Feynman
User avatar
mikehalloran
Posts: 15235
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:08 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Sillie Con Valley

Re: DP MP3 creation vs iTunes.

Post by mikehalloran »

IsrealHernandez wrote: Tue May 09, 2023 3:22 am I always use iTunes to convert MP3 files. It's much more convenient and faster than DP.
Although true on both counts, there are faster and better tools for batch conversion—which iTunes/Apple Music also does..

DSP-Q is one that I have but TwistedWave is my go-to. I can convert hours of mixed file types to mp3 or m4a and export them to a new folder or sort them into their original folders as I like — takes a few seconds to a couple of minutes depending on how many of hours the source material there are. Was Mac only but there's a public beta for Windows on the site now.

https://twistedwave.com/

When in doubt, I REALLY recommend doing a null test between the bounced 32bFP wav file against the different app sources and rates of mp3 of interest, and even among the mp3 against themselves.
Use a nice FFT analyzer that shows you the full dynamic and freq. ranges for best comparisons (i.e., Voxengo, Melda).
This is a great way to become familiar with any mp3-created artifacts. You can easily hear the exact difference between them and tells you what to listen for in blind tests.

Play with this stuff for a couple of hours or so. Quite educational and fun! :)
mp3 players and browsers can play back just about anything though some old units have problems with m4a. I did a comparison on file sizes about 6 months ago between 256k and 320k. Apple iPods and iPhones default to 256kHz if selecting mp3 — even a 256GB Touch 7 like mine. I select m4a Apple Lossless 16bit instead, of course.

My old iPod Shuffles take either full .aif or 128k mp3 — tried listening to one on a cross-country flight in March. Yikes! My hearing has deteriorated over the years but not so much that 128k mp3s sound good. Where's that old 6 Transistor radio I had as a kid?
DP 11.31; 828mkII FW, micro lite, M4, MTP/AV USB Firmware 2.0.1
2023 Mac Studio M2 8TB, 192GB RAM, OS Sonoma 14.4.1, USB4 8TB external, M-Audio AIR 192|14, Mackie ProFxv3 6/10/12; 2012 MBPs Catalina, Mojave
IK-NI-Izotope-PSP-Garritan-Antares, LogicPro X, Finale 27.4, Dorico 5.2, Notion 6, Overture 5, TwistedWave, DSP-Q 5, SmartScore64 Pro, Toast 20 Pro
EMRR
Posts: 1079
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 11:17 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Contact:

Re: DP MP3 creation vs iTunes.

Post by EMRR »

Hmmm. Haven’t tried LAME in a long time, Itunes always kicked the crap out of it. LAME sounded….lame, and broken, at least 5 years ago. Nothing like the orig WAV, itunes was about indistinguishable.

YMM(clearly!)V
Doug Williams
Electromagnetic Radiation Recorders
The Martha Bassett Show broadcast mixer
Tape Op issue 73

DP 11.31
Studio M1 Max OS12.7.3
MOTU 16A and Monitor 8
M1 Pro MBP for remotes and editing
Post Reply