DP and notation experiences
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:06 pm
Just wondering if there was any news about upgrading DP9's notation features?
I had a piano MIDI file that I needed to get into a pdf format, so my first stop was Sibelius 7.5 - imported it into Sibelius, but it looked like a train wreck, didn't separate the staffs into treble and bass...etc.
Then I loaded it into DP8, in which the notation (Quickscribe) is fairly reliable, but still basic lacking in features (like sustain pedal markings, etc). It was usable, but then I thought I'd load the file into Logic X just to see how it would show up.
But, I have to say (with reluctance...), the notation part in Logic is way more advanced than most I've seen, everything showed up right, and all the pedal markings were there, and huge amounts of tweakable parameters, all kinds of dynamics and articulation markings to choose from.
So here's hoping DP9 can up the game in notation, but it's going to be formidable with what's out there already.
I had a piano MIDI file that I needed to get into a pdf format, so my first stop was Sibelius 7.5 - imported it into Sibelius, but it looked like a train wreck, didn't separate the staffs into treble and bass...etc.
Then I loaded it into DP8, in which the notation (Quickscribe) is fairly reliable, but still basic lacking in features (like sustain pedal markings, etc). It was usable, but then I thought I'd load the file into Logic X just to see how it would show up.
But, I have to say (with reluctance...), the notation part in Logic is way more advanced than most I've seen, everything showed up right, and all the pedal markings were there, and huge amounts of tweakable parameters, all kinds of dynamics and articulation markings to choose from.
So here's hoping DP9 can up the game in notation, but it's going to be formidable with what's out there already.