Audio Quality: Bias' interesting test (not great news 4 DP)

The forum for petitions, theoretical discussion, gripes, or other off topic discussion.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
The forum for petitions, theoretical discussion, gripes, or other matters outside deemed outside the scope of helping users make optimal use of MOTU hardware and software. Posts in other forums may be moved here at the moderators discretion. No politics or religion!!
Post Reply
User avatar
danny
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Audio Quality: Bias' interesting test (not great news 4 DP)

Post by danny »

http://www.bias-inc.com/products/peakPr ... ePaper.pdf
Top
lwilliam
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Valencia, CA
Contact:
Contact lwilliam

Post by lwilliam »

Interesting...it looks like Protools came in 2nd.

It appears that Logic and Wavelab did much worse than DP, however.

I was surprised that Cubase did as well as it did.
G5/DP 2.5Ghz/2.5GB Ram; OS 10.4.8; DP 4.61; PTLE 7.3; LogicPro 7.2.3; 002R/RME; Waves Platinum; Lots of other plugins...
Top
mastermix
Posts: 297
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: New York City

Post by mastermix »

Don't get me wrong -- I use Peak Pro 5 but the tests look a bit rigged
to me.

It's like Saddam getting 99% of the votes during an election.

Look who is conducting this test ;-)

Kris..
Top
Studio615
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Carlisle PA
Contact:
Contact Studio615

Post by Studio615 »

Yeah, and it's funny that the company's name is BIAS.
Powerbook G4 1.67ghz (15"), 828mkII, rockit 8 monitors, and lots of coffee on those long late night sessions.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “MOTU Theoretical Discussions, Gripes, Petitions & Off Topic”