Shooshie wrote:amplidood wrote:
But the next generation is going to choose what works the best for them, and if it involves freezing and unfreezing tracks, it ain't gonna be DP. Not with such speedy competition out there.
Shooshie
You hit the nail on the head bro, and the outcome of This will directly effect you and me my brotha....
because if DP gets dumped by all the young ones who don;t want to put up with inefficient code, MOTU will go under.
Or, They might survive with their hardware for sometime, but if their DAW becomes a dinosaur, how many resources do you think they will be able to put into an outdated program compared to all the little usb nick knacks they sell?
It is good you are comfortable with your work flow and have the time to render VIs. But the future of your fav DAW is riding on efficiency. And this question of efficiency has plagued DP for many many years. Personally, I am very tired of DPs efficiency problems.
I have had my butt saved by VE Pro 5, it makes DP almost work as good as it should.
When I upgrade my RAM this week, it should really be cool.
But that expenditure equals 1000 when all is said and done, (RAM plus Vienna).
What kid in a garage can pay for that when other programs already work properly?
I was actually enjoying working today, no crashes, thinking of writing a nice post about all the stuff I love about DP.
But then I read this thread and it irks me and reminds me how many years DP has been inefficient..yikes, I’nm starting to rant...there’s goes the success story..lol....
Back to the music...