DI Avalon U5 vs. MOTU Track16

Here's where to talk about preamps, cables, microphones, monitors, etc.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
Here's where to talk about preamps, cables, microphones, monitors, etc.
Post Reply
kabbe
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 12:47 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

DI Avalon U5 vs. MOTU Track16

Post by kabbe »

Hello!

I was wondering if anyone has done a comparison between the DI input that comes with the MOTU Track16 and the Avalon U5? The Avalon U5 should of course sound better if you go buy the price but that´s not always true.
I´m looking to buy one to get better guitar and bass tracks straight in the soundcard (that I use a amp-plugin with later on).

It sounds good the way it is now with the MOTU Track16, great soundcard, but I´m always working to get better sounding stuff.

Hope that anyone can help me. Thanks!
/ Daniel
User avatar
Todzilla
Posts: 323
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:47 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: DI Avalon U5 vs. MOTU Track16

Post by Todzilla »

I have a Demeter HM-1 preamp with DI inputs. As you may know, Demeter is highly regarded for its DIs.

However, my bass player came over with his Avalon U5 and the difference was unbelieveable, to the Avalon's credit. I don't know the Track 16s DIs, but my 896HD DIs are far inferior to my Demeter's which are in turn, far inferior to my buddy's Avalon.

I'm not a big golden ears guy, but I'm telling you the Avalon RULED on bass. (It didn't hurt this guy is a major bass monster).
-Todzilla
Huge sound generation & capture facilities
On the banks of the River Eno
__________________________________________________
DP 8!!!, OSX 10.7.3, 15" MacBook Pro w 16G RAM 256G SSD & 630GHD, MOTU 896HD, MX4, Komplete 8, Apogee Symphony I/O, Neumann U-89, pair of Peluso P12s, Seventh Circle & Demeter preamps, Lava lamp, stuffed frog playing bongos
User avatar
James Steele
Site Administrator
Posts: 21079
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: San Diego, CA - U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: DI Avalon U5 vs. MOTU Track16

Post by James Steele »

Todzilla wrote:I'm not a big golden ears guy, but I'm telling you the Avalon RULED on bass. (It didn't hurt this guy is a major bass monster).
I have two of them and I like them! :)
JamesSteeleProject.com | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter

Mac Studio M1 Max, 64GB/2TB, MacOS 14.4.1 Sonoma, DP 11.31, MOTU 828es, MOTU 24Ai, MOTU MIDI Express XT, UAD-2 TB3 Satellite OCTO, Console 1 Mk2, Avid S3, NI Komplete Kontrol S88 Mk2, Red Type B, Millennia HV-3C, Warm Audio WA-2A, AudioScape 76F, Dean guitars, Marshall amps, etc., etc.!
MixermanMikey
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:52 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Nashville, TN

Re: DI Avalon U5 vs. MOTU Track16

Post by MixermanMikey »

Just another guy's opinion...

I had a few U5s at one point. I also had several other DIs-API, the active and passive Radial ones and a few other mid priced thingies. To me, the U5 had a "breath" or "air" on the bottom end. Very much like the way people describe it on the top end. On the other hand, the API and Radials through the API, Flamingo and Buzz Audio pres had a very focused sound. It wasn't like it was a bad thing or a good thing. Just focused.

If I wanted to capture the full range of an instrument, the U5 would be the box that I would go to. It's not what I always want to capture, however.

Like most things we collect, they're all just tools. Sometimes you need a wrench and sometimes you need a screwdriver.

Anyway, just my nickel's worth. (adjusted for post Bretton-Woods)

Mikey
No turntables and two microphones!
User avatar
mhschmieder
Posts: 11282
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Annandale VA

Re: DI Avalon U5 vs. MOTU Track16

Post by mhschmieder »

I used the U5 for many years, until returning to standard bass-specific amps a couple of years ago (I just upgraded last month to the new all-tube Mesa Prodigy head).

Excellent piece of gear, good for many things and not just bass. Many like the way more expensive M5 half-rack as an all-purpose DI/channel as it includes an excellent variable impedance mic pre-amp. The U5 is stellar though and one of the better and more neutral (and low noise) active DI's on the market.

I used Radial passive DI's for awhile too; the ones with Jensen transformers. Then after much research and many comparisons, I decided passive DI's are simply practical and great for live use but I almost always prefer the sound of active DI's in the studio due to the noise floor and generally way more headroom plus more transparent sound across the entire frequency spectrum. Currently I use Radial's new PZ-DI as it has three different impedance settings to cover everything from piezo pickups (usually on acoustic instruments but not always) to hot active pickups.

My True Precision 8 has two channels that internally switch to the DI circuitry when they receive an unbalanced ¼" input. Those are quite good for stereo sources (e.g. keyboards) but not as good as the Radial so I use the Radial on single-channel sources, along with taking advantage of its signal splitting to double-route a direct guitar/bass track alongside an amped track.

The MOTU interfaces will have DI's that are better than those built into most amps, but not of the quality of a Radial box or something like the Phoenix Audio Nice DI. Those are worth the investment. Or, an Avalon U5 will work quite well in that role as well. In a shootout though, I found the Radial more transparent and tighter overall. But just by a hair.
iMac 27" 2017 Quad-Core Intel i5 (3.8 GHz, 64 GB), OSX 13.6.1, MOTU DP 11.31, iZotope RX 10
RME Babyface Pro FS, Radial JDV Mk5, Hammond XK-4, Moog Voyager

Eugenio Upright, 60th Anniversary P-Bass, USA Geddy Lee J-Bass, Yamaha BBP35
Select Strat, 70th Anniversary Esquire, Johhny Marr Jaguar, 57 LP, Danelectro 12
Eastman T486RB, T64/V, Ibanez PM2, D'angelico Deluxe SS Bari, EXL1
Guild Bari, 1512 12-string, M20, Martin OM28VTS, Larivee 0040MH
Post Reply