DP pan law?

Discussion of Digital Performer use, optimization, tips and techniques on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for most discussion related to the use and optimization of Digital Performer [MacOS] and plug-ins as well as tips and techniques. It is NOT for troubleshooting technical issues, complaints, feature requests, or "Comparative DAW 101."
User avatar
FMiguelez
Posts: 8266
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Body: Narco-México Soul/Heart: NYC

DP pan law?

Post by FMiguelez »

Does anybody know for sure what DP's pan law is?

I suspect it's -3.5, but I have no way of confirming.
Mac Mini Server i7 2.66 GHs/16 GB RAM / OSX 10.14 / DP 9.52
Tascam DM-24, MOTU Track 16, all Spectrasonics' stuff,
Vienna Instruments SUPER PACKAGE, Waves Mercury, slaved iMac and Mac Minis running VEP 7, etc.

---------------------------

"In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth." ― Richard Feynman
User avatar
FMiguelez
Posts: 8266
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Body: Narco-México Soul/Heart: NYC

Re: DP pan law?

Post by FMiguelez »

BTW, perhaps this is a clue?

In the Bounce to Disk dialog box, there's an option that reads "Mono with 3.5 dB attenuation".

But, shouldn't it be 6.02 dB attenuation if we don't take the pan law into account?

So, is that option with 3.5 dB attenuation ON TOP of DP's (automatic) pan law (so they add to 6.02 dB), or is it only a precaution to help avoiding clipping the signal?

I'm confused because, if I understand correctly, summing something to mono means the same signal will sound equally loud on both speakers, therefore duplicating the apparent loudness with respect to a hard panned signal.
That would be the same as increasing the voltage, or, in this case, the resulting gain by 6.02 dB, yes?
So why the 3.5 attenuation? Where does it come from? :?
Mac Mini Server i7 2.66 GHs/16 GB RAM / OSX 10.14 / DP 9.52
Tascam DM-24, MOTU Track 16, all Spectrasonics' stuff,
Vienna Instruments SUPER PACKAGE, Waves Mercury, slaved iMac and Mac Minis running VEP 7, etc.

---------------------------

"In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth." ― Richard Feynman
User avatar
mikehalloran
Posts: 15213
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:08 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Sillie Con Valley

Re: DP pan law?

Post by mikehalloran »

There's power and amplitude.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decibel

If you want to read a lengthy thread on the subject, try here. Logic, not DP but it will get you in the right direction.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1005954?tstart=0
DP 11.31; 828mkII FW, micro lite, M4, MTP/AV USB Firmware 2.0.1
2023 Mac Studio M2 8TB, 192GB RAM, OS Sonoma 14.4.1, USB4 8TB external, M-Audio AIR 192|14, Mackie ProFxv3 6/10/12; 2012 MBPs Catalina, Mojave
IK-NI-Izotope-PSP-Garritan-Antares, LogicPro X, Finale 27.4, Dorico 5.2, Notion 6, Overture 5, TwistedWave, DSP-Q 5, SmartScore64 Pro, Toast 20 Pro
User avatar
Phil O
Posts: 7232
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Scituate, MA

Re: DP pan law?

Post by Phil O »

-3.5 is what I've heard. I think I measured it once, but I don't remember the results.

Easy enough to figure out with a test tone. I think there are still some free test tone generators around. If not, there are plenty of tones as wav files on the interwebs.

Phil
DP 11.23, 2020 M1 Mac Mini [9,1] (16 Gig RAM), Mac Pro 3GHz 8 core [6,1] (16 Gig RAM), OS 14.3.1/11.6.2, Lynx Aurora (n) 8tb, MOTU 8pre-es, MOTU M6, MOTU 828, Apogee Rosetta 800, UAD-2 Satellite, a truckload of outboard gear and plug-ins, and a partridge in a pear tree.
User avatar
Shooshie
Posts: 19820
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: DP pan law?

Post by Shooshie »

I'm not sure what the pan law is in Texas, but I'm very careful to look all around for cops before I pan. If they don't catch me, I can pan any way I want.

:koolaid:
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|
User avatar
HCMarkus
Posts: 9745
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
Contact:

Re: DP pan law?

Post by HCMarkus »

Shooshie wrote:I'm not sure what the pan law is in Texas, but I'm very careful to look all around for cops before I pan. If they don't catch me, I can pan any way I want.

:koolaid:
Panacea or Pandemic?

PS: Hi Sooshie!
User avatar
Shooshie
Posts: 19820
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: DP pan law?

Post by Shooshie »

HCMarkus wrote:
Shooshie wrote: :koolaid:
Panacea or Pandemic?
Exactly!
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|
User avatar
Babz
Posts: 1054
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: DP pan law?

Post by Babz »

I fought the law and the pan won.
User avatar
Phil O
Posts: 7232
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Scituate, MA

Re: DP pan law?

Post by Phil O »

Pan puns...


Only at Motunation. 8)
DP 11.23, 2020 M1 Mac Mini [9,1] (16 Gig RAM), Mac Pro 3GHz 8 core [6,1] (16 Gig RAM), OS 14.3.1/11.6.2, Lynx Aurora (n) 8tb, MOTU 8pre-es, MOTU M6, MOTU 828, Apogee Rosetta 800, UAD-2 Satellite, a truckload of outboard gear and plug-ins, and a partridge in a pear tree.
User avatar
HCMarkus
Posts: 9745
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
Contact:

Re: DP pan law?

Post by HCMarkus »

Babz wrote:I fought the law and the pan won.
:lol: :lol: :lol: (pandemonium)
User avatar
FMiguelez
Posts: 8266
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Body: Narco-México Soul/Heart: NYC

Re: DP pan law?

Post by FMiguelez »

You guys are making me panaroic with your jokes.

I haven't had time to test it (which is a good thing).
Mac Mini Server i7 2.66 GHs/16 GB RAM / OSX 10.14 / DP 9.52
Tascam DM-24, MOTU Track 16, all Spectrasonics' stuff,
Vienna Instruments SUPER PACKAGE, Waves Mercury, slaved iMac and Mac Minis running VEP 7, etc.

---------------------------

"In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth." ― Richard Feynman
User avatar
HCMarkus
Posts: 9745
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
Contact:

Re: DP pan law?

Post by HCMarkus »

Lawst in Space.
User avatar
cuttime
Posts: 4299
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

Re: DP pan law?

Post by cuttime »

Y'all are just fawning over this thread.
828x MacOS 13.6.6 M1 Studio Max 1TB 64G DP11.31
User avatar
Shooshie
Posts: 19820
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: DP pan law?

Post by Shooshie »

cuttime wrote:Y'all are just fawning over this thread.
It's just our stereofawnics you are referring to.
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|
User avatar
HCMarkus
Posts: 9745
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
Contact:

Re: DP pan law?

Post by HCMarkus »

Shooshie wrote:
cuttime wrote:Y'all are just fawning over this thread.
It's just our stereofawnics you are referring to.
It's 'cause yer back!

Fawntastic.
Post Reply