DP pan law?
Moderator: James Steele
Forum rules
This forum is for most discussion related to the use and optimization of Digital Performer [MacOS] and plug-ins as well as tips and techniques. It is NOT for troubleshooting technical issues, complaints, feature requests, or "Comparative DAW 101."
This forum is for most discussion related to the use and optimization of Digital Performer [MacOS] and plug-ins as well as tips and techniques. It is NOT for troubleshooting technical issues, complaints, feature requests, or "Comparative DAW 101."
- FMiguelez
- Posts: 8266
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Body: Narco-México Soul/Heart: NYC
DP pan law?
Does anybody know for sure what DP's pan law is?
I suspect it's -3.5, but I have no way of confirming.
I suspect it's -3.5, but I have no way of confirming.
Mac Mini Server i7 2.66 GHs/16 GB RAM / OSX 10.14 / DP 9.52
Tascam DM-24, MOTU Track 16, all Spectrasonics' stuff,
Vienna Instruments SUPER PACKAGE, Waves Mercury, slaved iMac and Mac Minis running VEP 7, etc.
---------------------------
"In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth." ― Richard Feynman
Tascam DM-24, MOTU Track 16, all Spectrasonics' stuff,
Vienna Instruments SUPER PACKAGE, Waves Mercury, slaved iMac and Mac Minis running VEP 7, etc.
---------------------------
"In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth." ― Richard Feynman
- FMiguelez
- Posts: 8266
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Body: Narco-México Soul/Heart: NYC
Re: DP pan law?
BTW, perhaps this is a clue?
In the Bounce to Disk dialog box, there's an option that reads "Mono with 3.5 dB attenuation".
But, shouldn't it be 6.02 dB attenuation if we don't take the pan law into account?
So, is that option with 3.5 dB attenuation ON TOP of DP's (automatic) pan law (so they add to 6.02 dB), or is it only a precaution to help avoiding clipping the signal?
I'm confused because, if I understand correctly, summing something to mono means the same signal will sound equally loud on both speakers, therefore duplicating the apparent loudness with respect to a hard panned signal.
That would be the same as increasing the voltage, or, in this case, the resulting gain by 6.02 dB, yes?
So why the 3.5 attenuation? Where does it come from?
In the Bounce to Disk dialog box, there's an option that reads "Mono with 3.5 dB attenuation".
But, shouldn't it be 6.02 dB attenuation if we don't take the pan law into account?
So, is that option with 3.5 dB attenuation ON TOP of DP's (automatic) pan law (so they add to 6.02 dB), or is it only a precaution to help avoiding clipping the signal?
I'm confused because, if I understand correctly, summing something to mono means the same signal will sound equally loud on both speakers, therefore duplicating the apparent loudness with respect to a hard panned signal.
That would be the same as increasing the voltage, or, in this case, the resulting gain by 6.02 dB, yes?
So why the 3.5 attenuation? Where does it come from?
Mac Mini Server i7 2.66 GHs/16 GB RAM / OSX 10.14 / DP 9.52
Tascam DM-24, MOTU Track 16, all Spectrasonics' stuff,
Vienna Instruments SUPER PACKAGE, Waves Mercury, slaved iMac and Mac Minis running VEP 7, etc.
---------------------------
"In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth." ― Richard Feynman
Tascam DM-24, MOTU Track 16, all Spectrasonics' stuff,
Vienna Instruments SUPER PACKAGE, Waves Mercury, slaved iMac and Mac Minis running VEP 7, etc.
---------------------------
"In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth." ― Richard Feynman
- mikehalloran
- Posts: 15227
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:08 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Sillie Con Valley
Re: DP pan law?
There's power and amplitude.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decibel
If you want to read a lengthy thread on the subject, try here. Logic, not DP but it will get you in the right direction.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1005954?tstart=0
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decibel
If you want to read a lengthy thread on the subject, try here. Logic, not DP but it will get you in the right direction.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1005954?tstart=0
DP 11.31; 828mkII FW, micro lite, M4, MTP/AV USB Firmware 2.0.1
2023 Mac Studio M2 8TB, 192GB RAM, OS Sonoma 14.4.1, USB4 8TB external, M-Audio AIR 192|14, Mackie ProFxv3 6/10/12; 2012 MBPs Catalina, Mojave
IK-NI-Izotope-PSP-Garritan-Antares, LogicPro X, Finale 27.4, Dorico 5.2, Notion 6, Overture 5, TwistedWave, DSP-Q 5, SmartScore64 Pro, Toast 20 Pro
2023 Mac Studio M2 8TB, 192GB RAM, OS Sonoma 14.4.1, USB4 8TB external, M-Audio AIR 192|14, Mackie ProFxv3 6/10/12; 2012 MBPs Catalina, Mojave
IK-NI-Izotope-PSP-Garritan-Antares, LogicPro X, Finale 27.4, Dorico 5.2, Notion 6, Overture 5, TwistedWave, DSP-Q 5, SmartScore64 Pro, Toast 20 Pro
Re: DP pan law?
-3.5 is what I've heard. I think I measured it once, but I don't remember the results.
Easy enough to figure out with a test tone. I think there are still some free test tone generators around. If not, there are plenty of tones as wav files on the interwebs.
Phil
Easy enough to figure out with a test tone. I think there are still some free test tone generators around. If not, there are plenty of tones as wav files on the interwebs.
Phil
DP 11.23, 2020 M1 Mac Mini [9,1] (16 Gig RAM), Mac Pro 3GHz 8 core [6,1] (16 Gig RAM), OS 14.3.1/11.6.2, Lynx Aurora (n) 8tb, MOTU 8pre-es, MOTU M6, MOTU 828, Apogee Rosetta 800, UAD-2 Satellite, a truckload of outboard gear and plug-ins, and a partridge in a pear tree.
- Shooshie
- Posts: 19820
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Dallas
- Contact:
Re: DP pan law?
I'm not sure what the pan law is in Texas, but I'm very careful to look all around for cops before I pan. If they don't catch me, I can pan any way I want.
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|
- HCMarkus
- Posts: 9751
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
- Contact:
Re: DP pan law?
Panacea or Pandemic?Shooshie wrote:I'm not sure what the pan law is in Texas, but I'm very careful to look all around for cops before I pan. If they don't catch me, I can pan any way I want.
PS: Hi Sooshie!
- Shooshie
- Posts: 19820
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Dallas
- Contact:
Re: DP pan law?
Exactly!HCMarkus wrote:Panacea or Pandemic?Shooshie wrote:
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|
Re: DP pan law?
I fought the law and the pan won.
Re: DP pan law?
Pan puns...
Only at Motunation.
Only at Motunation.
DP 11.23, 2020 M1 Mac Mini [9,1] (16 Gig RAM), Mac Pro 3GHz 8 core [6,1] (16 Gig RAM), OS 14.3.1/11.6.2, Lynx Aurora (n) 8tb, MOTU 8pre-es, MOTU M6, MOTU 828, Apogee Rosetta 800, UAD-2 Satellite, a truckload of outboard gear and plug-ins, and a partridge in a pear tree.
- HCMarkus
- Posts: 9751
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
- Contact:
Re: DP pan law?
(pandemonium)Babz wrote:I fought the law and the pan won.
- FMiguelez
- Posts: 8266
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Body: Narco-México Soul/Heart: NYC
Re: DP pan law?
You guys are making me panaroic with your jokes.
I haven't had time to test it (which is a good thing).
I haven't had time to test it (which is a good thing).
Mac Mini Server i7 2.66 GHs/16 GB RAM / OSX 10.14 / DP 9.52
Tascam DM-24, MOTU Track 16, all Spectrasonics' stuff,
Vienna Instruments SUPER PACKAGE, Waves Mercury, slaved iMac and Mac Minis running VEP 7, etc.
---------------------------
"In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth." ― Richard Feynman
Tascam DM-24, MOTU Track 16, all Spectrasonics' stuff,
Vienna Instruments SUPER PACKAGE, Waves Mercury, slaved iMac and Mac Minis running VEP 7, etc.
---------------------------
"In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth." ― Richard Feynman
- HCMarkus
- Posts: 9751
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
- Contact:
Re: DP pan law?
Lawst in Space.
Re: DP pan law?
Y'all are just fawning over this thread.
828x MacOS 13.6.6 M1 Studio Max 1TB 64G DP11.31
- Shooshie
- Posts: 19820
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Dallas
- Contact:
Re: DP pan law?
It's just our stereofawnics you are referring to.cuttime wrote:Y'all are just fawning over this thread.
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|
- HCMarkus
- Posts: 9751
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
- Contact:
Re: DP pan law?
It's 'cause yer back!Shooshie wrote:It's just our stereofawnics you are referring to.cuttime wrote:Y'all are just fawning over this thread.
Fawntastic.