New Product: MOTU Track 16

Discussion of Digital Performer use, optimization, tips and techniques on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for most discussion related to the use and optimization of Digital Performer [MacOS] and plug-ins as well as tips and techniques. It is NOT for troubleshooting technical issues, complaints, feature requests, or "Comparative DAW 101."
User avatar
KarlSutton
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Mount Juliet, TN
Contact:

Re: New Product: MOTU Track 16

Post by KarlSutton »

mikehalloran wrote:>It is somehow funny they only included FW400 interface (although using a FW800 connector), not a FW800 interface.<

I don't understand your concern.

No MOTU devices are FW800. Since FW400 is forwards compatible and the bandwidth of FW800 isn't needed, it makes no sense to cripple the functionality and backwards compatibility.
I personally wish they made a true fw800 device so that my firewire chain wouldn't be slowed down to 400 (hard drives) This would be handy when editing HD video & using a good audio interface for monitoring.
MPB 17" 2.66 i7/8GB RAM, OSX 10.6.8, DP 7.24, 828 mkII, Ethno 1 via Ultimate Soundbank, MX4, MSI, Komplete 9, Ivory, Stylus RMX.

for a time:MacPro6,1 3Ghz 8 core 32GB RAM
jamesdunlopmusic
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 2:52 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: New Product: MOTU Track 16

Post by jamesdunlopmusic »

And it's now on motu.com!
Mac Pro 2.8 ghz Quad Core, 32gb RAM, DP 8.07, OS X 10.8.5
steff3
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 11:07 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: New Product: MOTU Track 16

Post by steff3 »

>> I personally wish they made a true fw800 device so that my firewire chain wouldn't be slowed down to 400 (hard drives) This would be handy when editing HD video & using a good audio interface for monitoring. >>

hmmm, in theory the chain should not be slowed down as long as the FW400 are connected to the end of the chain (which is the only possibility with the track16 anyways I think).

This is what UAudio states for the UAD2 Sat and here:
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/music-co ... -loss.html

http://www.mhsecure.com/technotes/TechN ... N_0010.php

[ I think FW was co-developed by Apple, not by Microsoft .... that might be why it behaves more pro ... ;) ]

so, this should not be a concern.

hope that helps

best
User avatar
MIDI Life Crisis
Posts: 26254
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Contact:

New Product: MOTU Track 16

Post by MIDI Life Crisis »

I was under the impression if the FW devices were on the same buss, they would all default to the slower speed. Is that incorrect?
2013 Mac Pro 32GB RAM

OSX 10.14.6; DP 10; Track 16; Finale 26, iPad Pro, et al

MIDI LIFE CRISIS
rhythm_kitchen
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:26 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: SF, S.South Bay

Re: New Product: MOTU Track 16

Post by rhythm_kitchen »

Firewire like SCSI, the turtle sets the pace.

Interesting timing on this release?

Conference attendees may get a good whiff of AT&T Park.

Enjoy.
rhythm_kitchen
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:26 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: SF, S.South Bay

Re: New Product: MOTU Track 16

Post by rhythm_kitchen »

USB-3 (hopefully) solves this conundrum:
http://www.datapro.net/techinfo/usb_3_explained.html

With this:
http://www.siig.com/it-products/usb/bay ... t-hub.html

p.s. Maybe I answered my own question. Compatibility. WWDCees - not the pre-game whiff either. Ha.
User avatar
James Steele
Site Administrator
Posts: 21013
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: San Diego, CA - U.S.A.
Contact:

New Product: MOTU Track 16

Post by James Steele »

MIDI Life Crisis wrote:I was under the impression if the FW devices were on the same buss, they would all default to the slower speed. Is that incorrect?
Good question. I should try and look this up because I thought that too, but vaguely remember a discussion in which someone said that was actually urban myth? Hmmmm
JamesSteeleProject.com | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter

Mac Studio M1 Max, 64GB/2TB, MacOS 14.4 Sonoma, DP 11.31, MOTU 828es, MOTU 24Ai, MOTU MIDI Express XT, UAD-2 TB3 Satellite OCTO, Console 1 Mk2, Avid S3, NI Komplete Kontrol S88 Mk2, Red Type B, Millennia HV-3C, Warm Audio WA-2A, AudioScape 76F, Dean guitars, Marshall amps, etc., etc.!
User avatar
bayswater
Posts: 11910
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:06 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Vancouver

Re: New Product: MOTU Track 16

Post by bayswater »

MIDI Life Crisis wrote:I was under the impression if the FW devices were on the same buss, they would all default to the slower speed. Is that incorrect?
Hard to say. I read up on this and found a lot of contradictory views. So I tried running a disk speed test. Set up is FW 800 on the iMac over a FW 800 cable to a FW 800 Lacie disk, then a FW 800/400 adaptor cable from the Lacie to the FW 400 port on the MOTU 828 Mk 3.

WIth that setup, I ran the test with no audio playing, and then again with iTunes playing through the 828. Disk speed was slower with the audio playback running. Then I switched the audio out to a USB interface (Lexicon Alpha), and left everything else connected as before. The original disk speed was restored.

The speed with no audio over the bus was a little over 70 MBytes/sec. Accounting for overhead bits this must be nearly 600 Mbits/sec, which I think is close to the real world sustained throughput on a FW800 bus (??). But the lower speed was around 56 MBytes/sec which is faster than 400 Mbits/sec.

So, using the FW400 link slowed things down, but merely having it there didn't. And the slow down didn't take the entire bus down to 400 Mbits as you might expect if the slowest link rules.
2018 Mini i7 32G 10.14.6, DP 11.3, Mixbus 9, Logic 10.5, Scarlett 18i8
User avatar
kgdrum
Posts: 4068
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: NYC

New Product: MOTU Track 16

Post by kgdrum »

It depends on how you route the FireWire devices.

Read this: http://www.mhsecure.com/technotes/TechN ... N_0010.php
2012 Mac Pro 3.46GHz 12 core 96 gig,Mojave, DP11.01,Logic 10.51, RME UCX,Great River ME-1NV,a few microphones,UAD2, Komplete 12U,U-he,Omni & way too many VI's,Synths & FX galore!, Mimic Pro w/ SD3,Focal Twin 6 monitors, Shunyata...........
rhythm_kitchen
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:26 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: SF, S.South Bay

Re: New Product: MOTU Track 16

Post by rhythm_kitchen »

There must be some glitch in Firewire 800 for audio. Hopefully SIIG will release a TB expansion box with this chipset, unlike Belkin's revamped unit.
http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/05/belk ... ress-dock/

What about a Firewire 800 drive mid stream in this workaround from Avid? Full bandwidth or reduced?
http://avid.force.com/pkb/articles/en_US/FAQ/en207933

Could LaCie be using an older Oxford chipset?
Last edited by rhythm_kitchen on Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
steff3
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 11:07 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: New Product: MOTU Track 16

Post by steff3 »

bayswater wrote:Hard to say. I read up on this and found a lot of contradictory views. So I tried running a disk speed test. Set up is FW 800 on the iMac over a FW 800 cable to a FW 800 Lacie disk, then a FW 800/400 adaptor cable from the Lacie to the FW 400 port on the MOTU 828 Mk 3.

WIth that setup, I ran the test with no audio playing, and then again with iTunes playing through the 828. Disk speed was slower with the audio playback running. Then I switched the audio out to a USB interface (Lexicon Alpha), and left everything else connected as before. The original disk speed was restored.

The speed with no audio over the bus was a little over 70 MBytes/sec. Accounting for overhead bits this must be nearly 600 Mbits/sec, which I think is close to the real world sustained throughput on a FW800 bus (??). But the lower speed was around 56 MBytes/sec which is faster than 400 Mbits/sec.

So, using the FW400 link slowed things down, but merely having it there didn't. And the slow down didn't take the entire bus down to 400 Mbits as you might expect if the slowest link rules.
Well, it is not that easy to say with this example, as it is not unlikely that the FW-audio interface reserves some resources - e.g. 8 audio in/out tracks - although you only just need one. For the RME Fireface you can allocate different firewire resources/bandwidth - just analog channels, just digital channels, 8 analog and 8 digital, all, etc. Also the UAD Sat lets you reserve bandwidth - I guess MOTU is doing something along that line.

UAudio and MH Labs say that it is not necessarily the case that the whole bus gets slowed down, if the order is correct. I guess both would not say so and seem to be reliable sources. Of course, there are a multitude of FW chips, so this might influence the results.

best
User avatar
bayswater
Posts: 11910
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:06 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Vancouver

Re: New Product: MOTU Track 16

Post by bayswater »

Steff3, thanks for that observation. Makes sense. My conclusion was that putting a 400mb device in the chain does not slow down the whole chain despite having read a lot of seemingly authoritative sources saying it does.

The other thing about 400 versus 800 as already mentioned is whether it even matters. Driving every channel in and out on the 828 Mk 3 at 24/48 would in theory use less than half the bandwidth of a FW400 bus, leaving enough to read and write the same channels.
2018 Mini i7 32G 10.14.6, DP 11.3, Mixbus 9, Logic 10.5, Scarlett 18i8
User avatar
wonder
Posts: 1477
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: LA/OC
Contact:

New Product: MOTU Track 16

Post by wonder »

Dual Quad-Core 2.8 GHz Mac Pro 3,1 • Yosemite • 24 GB RAM • MOTU 2408mk3 (x's 2) • DP 10.xx • Finale 25 • Logic • PT 12 • +outboard gear
User avatar
MIDI Life Crisis
Posts: 26254
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Contact:

Re: New Product: MOTU Track 16

Post by MIDI Life Crisis »

Equally important... $$$$$$$$$$
2013 Mac Pro 32GB RAM

OSX 10.14.6; DP 10; Track 16; Finale 26, iPad Pro, et al

MIDI LIFE CRISIS
User avatar
toodamnhip
Posts: 3839
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Contact:

Re: New Product: MOTU Track 16

Post by toodamnhip »

Not to spoil the party, but I am not sure what all the fuss is about. When I 1st saw this thread, I thought MOTU finally made an automatable control surface. But this is just a fancier audio in/out system up a step or so from the MK III right?

It is cool, but for those of us who have a MOTU audio interface we are happy with, does this product add anything?
What am I missing?
Mac Pro (Late 2013
2.7 GHz 12-Core Intel Xeon E5
64 GB 1866 MHz DDR3
Mojave
DP 10.13
MOTU 8pre, MTP AV, 828 mkII
Tons of VIS and plug ins. SSD hard drives etc
Post Reply