Read more on methodology and limitations on the test here:Conclusions
We've now moved 800TB of data on and off each drive, across two separate firmwares per drive. For "normal" installations, that's right around eight years of extremely heavy system and application drive use. We are seeing some fairly significant cell failure quantities, but as the drives are over-provisioned, or more flash cells than required in the drive to hit the advertised capacity, so we're still at 100 percent storage capacity. The drives are still usable, but given how hard we've hit the drives, in an abundance of caution, we aren't going to use them for anything mission-critical anymore
So, we're not seeing any problems, and we've put years of use on the entire line in just a few weeks. We theorize that most of the complaints about drive corruption on the Linux side of the fence is more about queued Trim, which is not implemented in OS X. This isn't a guarantee, as it is a heavily time-compressed test, but we here at MacNN feel safe about using the highly regarded Samsung offerings without qualm.
http://www.macnn.com/articles/15/07/24/ ... z3gtsy4jUi
