Protools 10.3 to DP 8 , best procedure?

For seeking technical help with Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
User avatar
Phil O
Posts: 7231
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Scituate, MA

Re: Protools 10.3 to DP 8 , best procedure?

Post by Phil O »

MIDI Life Crisis wrote:What if you name them GomerGoober.L and .R? Will that change the sound?
I'll do a null test and get back to you.
DP 11.23, 2020 M1 Mac Mini [9,1] (16 Gig RAM), Mac Pro 3GHz 8 core [6,1] (16 Gig RAM), OS 14.3.1/11.6.2, Lynx Aurora (n) 8tb, MOTU 8pre-es, MOTU M6, MOTU 828, Apogee Rosetta 800, UAD-2 Satellite, a truckload of outboard gear and plug-ins, and a partridge in a pear tree.
alex2035
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 7:47 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contact:

Re: Protools 10.3 to DP 8 , best procedure?

Post by alex2035 »

It seems that Phils post answer the quest. Changing the name does this,as I was also told by a local DP user. Although I finally dont seem to need it for now, we did the C7 piano recording today , each mic went to its own PT mono track, 7 of them. Ill go for an AAF to import to DP and place pans to reproduce their recording placement.

I will try the mono stereo procedure at any moment as well, thanks everyone.

alex
www.swingmusica.com
Post Reply