I'll do a null test and get back to you.MIDI Life Crisis wrote:What if you name them GomerGoober.L and .R? Will that change the sound?
Protools 10.3 to DP 8 , best procedure?
Moderator: James Steele
Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
Re: Protools 10.3 to DP 8 , best procedure?
DP 11.23, 2020 M1 Mac Mini [9,1] (16 Gig RAM), Mac Pro 3GHz 8 core [6,1] (16 Gig RAM), OS 14.3.1/11.6.2, Lynx Aurora (n) 8tb, MOTU 8pre-es, MOTU M6, MOTU 828, Apogee Rosetta 800, UAD-2 Satellite, a truckload of outboard gear and plug-ins, and a partridge in a pear tree.
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 7:47 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Contact:
Re: Protools 10.3 to DP 8 , best procedure?
It seems that Phils post answer the quest. Changing the name does this,as I was also told by a local DP user. Although I finally dont seem to need it for now, we did the C7 piano recording today , each mic went to its own PT mono track, 7 of them. Ill go for an AAF to import to DP and place pans to reproduce their recording placement.
I will try the mono stereo procedure at any moment as well, thanks everyone.
alex
www.swingmusica.com
I will try the mono stereo procedure at any moment as well, thanks everyone.
alex
www.swingmusica.com