Search found 377 matches
- Tue Jun 11, 2013 12:29 pm
- Forum: General Macintosh
- Topic: MacPro 2008 8-core vs. 2012 12-core
- Replies: 47
- Views: 5462
Re: MacPro 2008 8-core vs. 2012 12-core
I have the 2008 8-Core Mac Pro and I have the 2012 12-core. The twelve core is significantly faster and it supports much more ram than the 8-core. Given the 64-bit world that we live in now, just having the ability to have more ram just might be worth the price of admission. My 8-core, 24MB machine ...
- Wed May 01, 2013 9:00 am
- Forum: Digital Performer [MacOS]: Usage, Techniques, Tips & Optimization
- Topic: A list of some of the NEW features in 8.02
- Replies: 1
- Views: 367
A list of some of the NEW features in 8.02
New features introduced in version 8.02 A 30-day demo period is now available, as explained earlier in this document. Digital Performer is now available for online purchase from the motu.com/store. DP's new welcome window appears at launch and provides quick access to recent files, new project templ...
- Wed May 01, 2013 8:56 am
- Forum: Digital Performer [MacOS]: Usage, Techniques, Tips & Optimization
- Topic: DP 8 NOW AVAILABLE TO DEMO!!!!
- Replies: 13
- Views: 994
DP 8 NOW AVAILABLE TO DEMO!!!!
This could really be a game changer!!!!!!! And to add, the ability to purchase the product online at MOTU is HUGE!!!!!! Great job MOTU!!!!!!
- Wed May 01, 2013 8:46 am
- Forum: Digital Performer [MacOS]: Usage, Techniques, Tips & Optimization
- Topic: NO MORE L.A.M.E. for 8.02
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1497
Re: NO MORE L.A.M.E. for 8.02
Great looking new "Welcome Screen" at launch!!!!!
- Wed May 01, 2013 8:45 am
- Forum: Digital Performer [MacOS]: Usage, Techniques, Tips & Optimization
- Topic: NO MORE L.A.M.E. for 8.02
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1497
NO MORE L.A.M.E. for 8.02
This is really exciting!!!!! Finally its built-in!!! No more wondering which version of L.A.M.E. is the better on etc!!! Great job MOTU!!!!
- Sun Dec 23, 2012 11:29 am
- Forum: Digital Performer [MacOS]: Troubleshooting/Criticism
- Topic: Say it isn't so? Only mono panners on stereo tracks?
- Replies: 86
- Views: 6120
Re: Say it isn't so? Only mono panners on stereo tracks?
I honestly don't get what the deal is here. Frankly, stereo to me isn't panned, its balanced. In other words, the energy on stereo tracks should be the same on both the left and right tracks. If stereo isn't balanced, the output is tilted and that's not what you want for stereo tracks. There are too...
- Sat Dec 15, 2012 11:01 pm
- Forum: General Recording
- Topic: Trigger Pulled...Focal Twin6 Be
- Replies: 28
- Views: 5100
Re: Gettin' Ready To Pull The Trigger (Maybe). Focal Solo 6.
Here's a semi-old pic of my mixing space. A lot has changed since this pic was taken but you can see the twins.....
- Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:37 pm
- Forum: General Recording
- Topic: Trigger Pulled...Focal Twin6 Be
- Replies: 28
- Views: 5100
Re: Gettin' Ready To Pull The Trigger (Maybe). Focal Solo 6.
I own the twins and the Solo's! You'll be very happy with the twins!!! I absolutely love them!!
- Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:59 pm
- Forum: Digital Performer [MacOS]: Troubleshooting/Criticism
- Topic: DP8 is a giant drag. Can anyone suggest a new DAW? (TROLL)
- Replies: 25
- Views: 2553
Re: DP8 is a giant drag. Can anyone suggest a new DAW?
Wow..... You're a real a**!!! There's NO emergency for 64 Bit! I've been doing just fine without it as have MANY others! As for me, I'll wait for the majors such as Universal Audio to release their 64 Bit versions. It's certainly not stopping me from working successfully!! I can't believe you joined...
- Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:47 pm
- Forum: Digital Performer [MacOS]: Usage, Techniques, Tips & Optimization
- Topic: DP 8.01 is released!
- Replies: 114
- Views: 7642
Re: DP 8.01 is released!
Hey! The updater didn't create a second copy of DP.... it just left one application in the folder, and it's DP 8.01. Didn't it always used to make a new one, and then you'd have to throw the old one away? I just did the update and it did leave the 8.0 copy. Hmm, I wonder what's the deal? Anywho, ev...
- Thu Nov 08, 2012 2:15 pm
- Forum: Digital Performer [MacOS]: Usage, Techniques, Tips & Optimization
- Topic: is ANYONE actually using CUEMIX?
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2803
Re: is ANYONE actually using CUEMIX?
I use it everyday.... It's a must in my studio.
- Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:22 pm
- Forum: Digital Performer [MacOS]: Usage, Techniques, Tips & Optimization
- Topic: UAD Software 6.3.2
- Replies: 1
- Views: 401
UAD Software 6.3.2
There's new software available for us UAD owners! It's not 64-bit yet but there are new goodies!! http://www.uaudio.com
- Mon Oct 15, 2012 2:44 pm
- Forum: Digital Performer [MacOS]: Troubleshooting/Criticism
- Topic: No Direct Hardware Playthrough in DP8? [SOLVED]
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1356
Re: No Direct Hardware Playthrough in DP8?
dix wrote:Thanks for checking.
Gah! Yet another DP8 issue that seems to be specific to me. Anyone have any suggestions as to what I'm doing wrong?
Which interface are you attempting to use? Direct Hardware Playthrough won't work with the your Apogee.
- Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:13 pm
- Forum: Digital Performer [MacOS]: Usage, Techniques, Tips & Optimization
- Topic: 44.1, 96 hut,hut, HIKE!!!
- Replies: 23
- Views: 1233
Re: 44.1, 96 hut,hut, HIKE!!!
Without question a higher sample rate is better than a lower sample rate. The question is how much better and at what cost? I maintain that after the track has been rendered down to the target rate of 44.1/16 for a CD that it's not a big enough difference to justify the additional overhead. Heck, mo...
- Mon Oct 01, 2012 2:39 pm
- Forum: Digital Performer [MacOS]: Usage, Techniques, Tips & Optimization
- Topic: 44.1, 96 hut,hut, HIKE!!!
- Replies: 23
- Views: 1233
Re: 44.1, 96 hut,hut, HIKE!!!
I tend to record at 44.1/24 always. There's no logical reason to record at 16-Bit other than for scratch tracks. If you can't get a great recording from 44.1, a higher sample rate isn't going to help you. There is reason to go to 48 if your recording may possibly end up on DVD since that's the sampl...